Ellis Sla Perspective

 Ellis Sla Perspective Essay

SLSSLA, 20, 69–92. Printed in the United States of America.


An Educational Perspective

Fly fishing rod Ellis

Brow University

Various SLA research workers have demonstrated a in dialect pedagogy (LP), yet the marriage between SLA and VINYLSKIVA is a difficult one, not really because of the restrictions of SLA itself nevertheless because the two disciplines entail different " Discourses” (Gee, 1990). In this paper it is argued that the educational point of view is needed to be able to examine how SLA may contribute to LP. Such a perspective advises ways in which SLA can be appraised in a pedagogically relevant method and, more importantly, what kinds of applications may be fruitful. It is suggested that relevance is likely to be obtained if SLA is used to cope with issues that professionals nominate as important to all of them. Different models of application are considered, reflecting other ways of looking at teaching. A behavioral version, according where teachers implement those behaviors that research has shown to be effective, is rejected. However , SLA can serve as a crucial source of information that can help to shape practitioners' theories of teaching (a intellectual model). Most importantly, it constitutes a source of " provisional specifications” that practitioners can evaluate in their individual contexts of action (an interpretation model). SLA also affords practitioners the means for conducting their particular investigations. In short, an educational perspective suggests that for SLA to affect LP, professionals need assistance in transforming knowledge about L2 acquisition in to practice.

‘... researchers need to justify themselves to practitioners, not practitioners to researchers. ' Stenhouse, 1981


SLA features in part, probably the larger part, been motivated by a great expressed aspire to improve language pedagogy. Aguijada (1994) produces, " Most of the work (in SLA) provides пЈ© 97 Cambridge University Press 0272-2631/97 $7. 60 +. 12



Rod Ellis

been completed by language experts who will be deeply considering teaching practice because some of them were instructors at one particular time” (p. 50). The task that Aguijada refers to has involved the study of naturalistic and instructed L2 acquisition. The explanation for learning the former can be provided by Hatch out, Flashner, and Hunt (1986): For both the tutor and the educator trainer, the task is to get those experience that bring about most to learning and work out techniques for bringing reasonable copies of the people experiences, plus the ways of working with them, in to the classroom. ( p. 20)

Thus, in the event scaffolding learners' utterances can be shown to help syntax learning in naturalistic acquisition (Hatch, 1978a), it may follow that teachers ought to find methods of introducing these kinds of scaffolding within their classrooms. This sort of application, however , is available to challenge; that follow that what is effective in naturalistic contexts works well in classrooms and, regardless if this may be demonstrated, it does not follow which the naturalistic way is the most successful way of learning. In contrast, study regarding instructed L2 acquisition generally seems to afford the chance of more direct application to teaching. Nevertheless , as we will shortly find, the application of advised SLA to LP is likewise problematic. A lot of SLA analysts have shown considerable reticence in applying the results of their work to language pedagogy. In early articles, Tarone, Swain, and Fathman (1976) and Hatch (1978a) argued that caution should be exercised. Hatch recognized that applying results from the domain name of study to the site of pedagogy often necessitated an " incredible leap in logic, ” which usually needed to be protected against. Implied in this view is the supposition that when researchers genuinely knew the facts of L2 acquisition it will be possible to give audio advice. Very long (1990a, l. 656) feels sufficiently confident to list a set of " well-attested information. ” Other folks, myself included,...

References: Alatis, J., Stern, H., & Strevens, P. (Eds. ). (1983). Utilized linguistics plus the preparation of teachers: Toward a reason. Washington, POWER: Georgetown University or college Press. Allwright, R. (1975). Problems inside the study from the language teacher's treatment of spanish student error. In M. Burt & They would. Dulay (Eds. ), About TESOL '75: New directions in second language teaching and bilingual education. Washington, POWER: TESOL. Apple, M., & Jungck, T. (1990). ‘You don't have to be a teacher to teach this kind of unit': Teaching, technology, and gender in their classroom. American Exploration Journal, 21 years old, 227–251. Applebee, A. (1987). Musings... educators and the procedure for research. Exploration in the Instructing of The english language, 21, 5–7. Bahns, M. (1990). Expert not ausloser: The position of the applied SLA researcher. English Terminology Teaching Log, 44, 110–116. Bailey, K., & Nunan, D. (Eds. ). (1996). Voices in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University or college Press. Beretta, A. (1991). Theory construction in SLA: Complementarity and opposition. Research in Secondary language Acquisition, 13, 493–511. Berwick, R. (1990). Task variant and repair in English skills. Kobe, Japan: Institute of Economic Study. Bolitho, L. (1991). An area second language purchase in teacher development and in teacher education programmes. In E. Sadtono (Ed. ), Language buy and the second/foreign language class (pp. 25–37). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Terminology Center. Brindley, G. (1990, March). Inquiry-based teacher education: A case study. Paper provided at the twenty fourth Annual TESOL Convention, S . fransisco. Brumfit, C., & Mitchell, R. (1990). The language class room as a emphasis for analysis. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds. ), Research inside the language class (pp. 3–15). ELT Files 133. Houndmills Basingstoke Hants, UK: Modern day English Journals. Calderhead, L. (1988). The introduction of knowledge set ups in learning to train. In J. Calderhead (Ed. ), Teacher's professional learning (pp. 51–64). London: Falmer Press. Canagarajah, A. (1996). From crucial research practice to essential research confirming. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 321–330. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming crucial: Education, know-how and actions research. Birmingham: Falmer.


Rod Ellis

Carroll, H., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and negative reviews: An empirical study from the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Buy, 3, 357–386. Chaudron, C. (1988). Secondary language classrooms: Study on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed. ), Handbook of research upon teaching. Ny: Macmillan. Clarke, M. (1994). The sex-related of theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, twenty eight, 9–26. Crookes, G. (1993). Action research and second language teachers: Heading beyond educator research. Used Linguistics, 13, 130–144. Crookes, G., & K. Rulon. (1985). Use of corrective feedback in native speaker/nonnative speaker discussion (Tech. Rep. No . 3). Honolulu: University or college of Beautiful hawaii, Center pertaining to Second Language Class Research. Dunkin, M., & Biddle, 3rd there’s r. (1986). Study regarding teaching. New york city: Holt, Reinhart and Winston. Eckman, Farreneheit., Highland, M., Lee, S., Milcham, L., & Ruthkowski Weber, L. (Eds. ). (1995). Secondary language acquisition theory and pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Elliott, J., & Ebutt, Deb. (Eds. ). (1985). Facilitating educational action research in schools. You are able to, UK: Longman. Ellis, 3rd there’s r. (1994). Second language acquisition study and teacher development: The situation of teachers' questions. In D. Li, D. Mahoney, & L. Richards (Eds. ), Checking out second language instructor development (pp. 175–193). Hk: City Polytechnic. Ellis, L. (1995a). Assessing second language acquisition theory pertaining to language pedagogy. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds. ), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 73–89). Oxford: Oxford College or university Press. Ellis, R. (1995b). Modified mouth input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied Linguistics, sixteen, 409–441. Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language instructing materials. The english language Language Instructing Journal, 51 (in press). Ellis, L, Tanaka, Sumado a., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, as well as the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449–491. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing specialist knowledge and competence. London: Falmer. Fischer, R. (1935). The design of tests. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd. Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1995). Toward theory-driven terminology pedagogy. In F. Eckman et 's. (Eds. ), Second language obtain theory and pedagogy (pp. 45–59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Foster, G. (1993). Discoursal outcomes of small group operate an EFL classroom: A look at the interaction of nonnative speakers. Thames Valley Doing work Papers in English Terminology Teaching, a couple of, 1–32. Foster, P., & Skehan, L. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on secondary language performance. Research in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323. Freeman, D. (1994). Knowing in doing: Teacher education as well as the problem of transfer. In D. Li, D. Mahoney, & M. Richards (Eds. ), Discovering second language instructor development (pp. 1–20). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic. Freeman, M. (1996). Redefining the relationship among research and what instructors know. In K. Cromwell & M. Nunan (Eds. ), Sounds from the class room (pp. 88–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Freeman, Deb., & Richards, J. (1993). Conceptions training and the education of second language teachers. TESOL Quarterly, twenty seven, 193–217. Gass, S. (1995). Learning and teaching: The mandatory intersection. In F. Eckman et 's. (Eds. ), Second language purchase theory and pedagogy (pp. 3–20). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Gee, T. (1990). Interpersonal linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer. Gregg, K. (1984). Krashen's monitor and Occam's razor. Applied Linguistics, 5, 79–100. Habermas, J. (1979). Interaction and the advancement of society (T. McCarthy, Trans. ). Boston: Bright spot Press. Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography, insurance plan making and practice in education. In D. Halpin & B. Iroga (Eds. ), Researching education plan: Ethical and methodological issues (pp. 139–153). London: Falmer. Hatch, E. (1978a). Apply with caution. Studies in Second Language Purchase, 2, 123–143. Hatch, Elizabeth. (1978b). Talk analysis and second language obtain. In At the. Hatch (Ed. ), Secondary language acquisition (pp. 401–435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Hatch out, E., Flashner, V., & Hunt, L. (1986). The experiential model and language teaching. In R. Time (Ed. ), Talking to master: Conversation in second language purchase (pp. 5–22). Rowley, MUM: Newbury Residence. Heath, S. (1983). Methods with words and phrases: Language, lifestyle and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hirst, P. (1966). Educational theory. In J. Tibbles (Ed. ), Study regarding education. Greater london: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Hopkins, M. (1985). A teacher's guide to classroom exploration. Buckingham, UK: Open University or college Press. Hudson, T. (1993). Nothing will not equal actually zero: Problems with applying developmental sequences findings to assessment and language pedagogy. Studies in Second Language Purchase, 15, 461–493.

SLA and Language Pedagogy


Jarvis, G. (1983). Pedagogical expertise for the 2nd language instructor. In M. Alatis, They would. Stern, & P. Strevens (Eds. ), Applied linguistics and the planning of teachers: Toward a rationale (pp. 234–241). Buenos aires, DC: Georgetown University Press. Johnston, Meters. (1987). Understanding learner terminology. In M. Nunan (Ed. ), Applying second language purchase research (pp. 5–44). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Exploration Center. Kemmis, S., & McTaggert, 3rd there’s r. (1981). The action analysis planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press. Kramsch, C. (1995). The applied linguist and the language teacher: Will they talk to each other? Australian Report on Applied Linguistics, 18, 1–16. Krashen, T. (1982). Concepts and practice in secondary language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Krashen, S. (1983). Secondary language acquisition theory and the preparing of instructors. In J. Alatis, L. Stern, & P. Strevens (Eds. ), Applied linguistics and the planning of teachers: Toward a rationale (pp. 255–263). Wa, DC: Georgetown University Press. Lantolf, T. (1995, September). Second language buy theory. Plenary address in the British Affiliation of Applied Linguists' Twelve-monthly Conference, Southampton, UK. Lantolf, J., & Appel, G. (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Larsen-Freeman, Deb. (1995). For the teaching and learning of grammar: Challenging the common myths. In Farrenheit. Eckman (Ed. ), Secondary language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 131–150). Mahwah, NJ-NEW JERSEY: Erlbaum. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, Meters. (1991). An intro to second language acquisition analysis. London: Longman. Lightbown, P. (1985a). May language obtain be altered by instruction? In T. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds. ), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 101–112). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Lightbown, P. (1985b). Great objectives: Second language buy research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6, 173–189. Lightbown, S., & Spada, N. (1993). How dialects are discovered. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Long, M. (1977). Educator feedback on learner mistake: Mapping notion. In L. D. Dark brown, C. Yorio, & Ur. Crymes (Eds. ), On TESOL '77 (pp. 278–293). Washington, POWER: TESOL. Lengthy, M. (1983). Training the other language tutor as class researcher. In J. Alatis, H. Demanding, & G. Strevens (Eds. ), Used linguistics plus the preparation of teachers: Toward a explanation (pp. 281–297). Washington, POWER: Georgetown School Press. Lengthy, M. (1990a). The least a second language purchase theory has to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649–666. Extended, M. (1990b). Second language class room research and teacher education. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds. ), Research in the language classroom (pp. 161–170). ELT Papers 133. Houndmills Basingstoke Hants, UK: Modern day English Guides. Long, Meters. (1993). Analysis strategies for SLA theories. Used Linguistics, 14, 225–249. Lengthy, M., & Sato, C. (1983). Class room foreigner talk discourse: Forms and capabilities of teachers' questions. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds. ), Class oriented exploration in secondary language acquisition (pp. 268–305). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Louden, W. (1991). Understanding educating: Continuity and alter in teacher's knowledge. Nyc: Cassell and Teachers' School Columbia. Markee, N. (1993). The durchmischung of creativity in vocabulary teaching. Gross annual Review of Used Linguistics, 13, 229–243. McDonough, J., & McDonough, H. (1990). Can be the use of study? English Language Teaching Diary, 44, 102–109. McIntyre, M. (1988). Building a educator education curriculum from analysis and theory on teacher knowledge. In J. Calderhead (Ed. ), Teachers' specialist learning (pp. 97–114). Greater london: Falmer. Nunan, D. (1990). The instructor as investigator. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds. ), Research in the language class (pp. 16–32). ELT Papers 133. Houndmills Basingstoke Hants, UK: Modern English Magazines. Nunan, D. (1991). Methods in secondary language classroom-oriented study: A critical review. Studies in Second Language Buy, 13, 249–274. Oakeshott, Meters. 1962. Rationalism in governmental policies: And other documents. London: Methuen. Orzechowska, E., & Smieja, A. (1994). ESL learners talking and thinking in their first dialect: Primary ESL students showing picture catalogs with a bilingual assistant. In G. Bore holes et al., Changing universities from within: Creating communities of enquiry (pp. 129–150). Barcelone, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Company for Research in Education. Peirce, W. (1995). Social identity, purchase and learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9–31. Pica, Big t. (1994). Inquiries from the dialect classroom: Analysis perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 49–79. Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Research in Secondary language Acquisition, several, 233–248. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological restrictions on the teachability of 'languages'. Studies in Second Language Obtain, 6, 186–214.


Fishing rod Ellis

Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In E. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds. ), Modelling and assessing secondary language acquisition (pp. 23–75). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Creating an acquisition-based procedure for examining second language purchase. Studies in Second Language Obtain, 10, 217–243. Richards, J. (1991). Content knowledge and instructional practice in second language teacher education. In T. Alatis (Ed. ), Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 41–51). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Richards, J., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University or college Press. Schachter, J. (1993). Second language purchase: Perceptions and possibilities. Second Language Research, 9, 173–187. Scherer, A., & Wertheimer, Meters. (1964). A psycholinguistic try things out in foreign language teaching. Ny: McGraw Mountain. Schmidt, They would., Norman, G., & Boshuizen, N. (1990). A cognitive perspective in medical expertise: Theory and implications. Academics Mecicine, twelve, 611–621. Schmidt, R. (1990). The part of intelligence in second language learning. Utilized Linguistics, 14, 129–158. Wirklich, D. (1983). The reflecting practitioner: Just how professionals think in action. Ny: Basic Literature. ВЁ Wirklich, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design to get teaching and learning in the ВЁ occupations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schumann, T. (1993). Several problems with pourriture: An example from SLA research. Applied Linguistics, 14, 295–306. Johnson, P. (1970). A comparison in the audiolingual and cognitive approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pa foreign language project. Philadelphia: Middle for Subjects Development. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum r and d. London: Heinemann. Stenhouse, L. (1978). Making use of research to education. Mimeograph, University of East Anglia, UK. Stenhouse, L. (1979). Using exploration means performing research. In H. Dahl (Ed. ), Spotlight on educational research (pp. 71–82). Oslo, Norwegian: Oslo School Press. Stenhouse, L. (1981). What is important as analysis? British Record of Educational Studies, up to 29, 103–114. Stenhouse, L. (1983). Research being a basis intended for teaching. In L. Stenhouse (Ed. ), Authority, education, and emancipation (pp. 177–195). London: Heinemann Educational. Stenhouse, L. (1984). A note in case study and academic practice. In R. Burgess (Ed. ), Field strategies in the study of education (pp. 211–233). London: Falmer. Stern, H., Wesche, Meters., & Harley, B. (1978). The impact of the language sciences on secondary language education. In P. Suppes (Ed. ), Impact of research upon education: Several case research (pp. 397–475). Washington, POWER: National Schools of Education. Stoller, Farreneheit. (1994). The diffusion of innovations in intensive ESL programs. Applied Linguistics, 15, 300–327. Tarone, E., Swain, M., & Fathman, A. (1976). A few limitations to the classroom applying current secondary language acquisition study. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 19–31. Tomlin, 3rd there’s r., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive scientific research and secondary language acquisition. Research in Second Language Acquisition, sixteen, 183–203. Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chi town: Chicago University Press. Your, P. (1992). Teacher learning. English Terminology Teaching Journal, 46, 56–61. van Relier, L. (1988). The class and the terminology learner. London, uk: Longman. truck Lier, T. (1990). Ethnography: Bandaid, bandwagon, or contraband. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds. ), Research inside the language class (pp. 33–53). ELT Files 113. Houndmills Basingstoke Hants, UK: Contemporary English Publications. van Serrer, L. (1994a). Forks and hopes: Preparing understanding in different ways. Used Linguistics, 15, 328–346. van Lier, M. (1994b). A few features of a theory of practice. TESOL Journal, 4, 6–10. Master, M. (1993). Developing the idea and practice of actions research: A South Africa case. Educational Action Research, 1, 95–109. Weiss, C. (Ed. ). (1977). Applying social research in public plan making. Lexington, CA: D. C. Heath. Wells, G. (1994). Launch: Teacher exploration and educational change. In G. Wells ain al. Changing schools from the inside: Creating residential areas of query, question, inquiry, interrogation (pp. 1–35). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Institute intended for Studies in Education. Light, R. (1993). Innovation in program expansion. Annual Report on Applied Linguistics, 13, 244–259. Widdowson, L. (1990). Aspects of language educating. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wright, T. (1992). Class research and teacher education: Towards a collaborative procedure. In L. Flowerdew, M. Brock, & S. Hsia (Eds. ), Perspectives about second language tutor education (pp. 187–209). Hong Kong: City Polytechnic. Zahorik, L. (1986). Purchasing teaching abilities. Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 21–25. Zobl, They would. (1995). Converging evidence pertaining to the ‘acquisition-learning' distinction. Used Linguistics, sixteen, 35–56.

English Action-word Tenses Final Test Article